convo

thepete's Discussion

  1. 4 Replies | 727 Views

    Can We Call It WW III NOW???

    I'm not sure how many major-theater/major-world-power wars need to be going on at once before we'll actually call this what it is: a world war.

    I know it's a big scary thing to call it a "world war" but I feel that we need to take responsibilty for all of this death and destruction before every continent is engulfed in combat.

    Merriam-Webster.com defines a "world war" as: "a war engaged in by all or most of the principal nations of the world,"

    That's pretty much what we've got going on here. So why not just call a spade a spade?

    OH YEAH. Because then we'd have to take responsibilty for it.

    Yick! Responsibility!

    Aug 11th 4pm Reply | Tag It | Send It | Collapse
  2. 266 Views

    RE: Can We Call It WW III NOW???

    wow really? well, shit how can i be so oblivious with the internet? if this is a true world war (and i've been getting

    Aug 11th 9pm Reply | Tag It | Send It | in reply to
  3. 285 Views

    RE: Can We Call It WW III NOW???

    I don't know. Websters says it's when most or all of the principal nations are involved--US, UK, Russia, who else

    Aug 11th 10pm Reply | Tag It | Send It | in reply to
  4. 274 Views

    RE: Can We Call It WW III NOW???

    Aug 27th 1am Reply | Tag It | Send It | in reply to
  5. 281 Views

    RE: Can We Call It WW III NOW???

    I wish I had your faith in my fellow human--I'm pretty sure it's the frog in the boiling water thing. You know, when

    Aug 27th 3pm Reply | Tag It | Send It | in reply to

About Us Feedback Terms of Service Developers Blog

© 2007-2009 RPM Communications, Inc. Patent Pending